Skip to content

Metacognition: computation, biology and function.

Stephen M Fleming, Raymond J Dolan, Christopher D Frith

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences May 1, 2012 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0021 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Review Peer reviewed
Keywords Animals Humans Cognition Consciousness Neurosciences Computer systems
Key findings Argues that metacognition—reflective monitoring and control processes studied across neuroscience, cognitive psychology, computer science, and philosophy—is best conceptualized through a framework in which level of representation, order of behaviour, and access consciousness are orthogonal dimensions. The authors also contend that further integration across these disciplines is needed, particularly regarding the definition, measurement, neurobiology, and possible functions of metacognition and its relationship to consciousness.

Abstract

Many complex systems maintain a self-referential check and balance. In animals, such reflective monitoring and control processes have been grouped under the rubric of metacognition. In this introductory article to a Theme Issue on metacognition, we review recent and rapidly progressing developments from neuroscience, cognitive psychology, computer science and philosophy of mind. While each of these areas is represented in detail by individual contributions to the volume, we take this opportunity to draw links between disciplines, and highlight areas where further integration is needed. Specifically, we cover the definition, measurement, neurobiology and possible functions of metacognition, and assess the relationship between metacognition and consciousness. We propose a framework in which level of representation, order of behaviour and access consciousness are orthogonal dimensions of the conceptual landscape.

Citations in the library

Explore topics