Symbol, Meaning, and the Sacred: A Study on Contemporary Malaise from the Perspective of Logotherapy and Analytical Psychology
Victor Lima De Souza, Sávio Emmerick, Cleia Zanatta
Research Square September 14, 2026 preprint DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10720823/v1 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that the erosion of symbols, meaning, and the sacred underlies contemporary psychological malaise, manifesting clinically as existential frustration and noogenic neurosis and collectively as fatalism, provisional existence, collectivism, and fanaticism. Contends that recovering meaning, values, and contact with the sacred is a relevant path for clinical practice, supported by empirical evidence linking religiousness and spirituality to mental health, though with modest effects conditioned by how religiousness is lived. |
Abstract
Abstract This theoretical essay investigates the relationship between contemporary psychological malaise and the impoverishment of the symbol, of meaning, and of the sacred. It sets out from the question of how the weakening of these three dimensions reverberates in human experience and in mental health. By means of interpretive reading and the critical articulation of classical and contemporary literature, foundational works of Logotherapy and Existential Analysis, of Analytical Psychology, and of the anthropology and phenomenology of religion, chiefly Frankl, Jung, Eliade, Campbell, and Diel, are placed in dialogue with recent scientific evidence on spirituality, religiousness, meaning in life, and mental health. The essay argues that the symbol constitutes a fundamental anthropological mediation between the immanent and the transcendent, and that its erosion deprives the individual of the narrative structures, myths, fables, and traditions historically responsible for the elaboration of the meaning of existence. The lack of meaning manifests clinically in existential frustration and in noogenic neurosis, with collective symptoms such as fatalism, provisional existence, collectivism, and fanaticism, whereas the weakening of the relationship with the sacred withdraws from the human being a resource whose positive association with mental health finds empirical support, albeit with modest effects conditioned by the way religiousness is lived. It concludes that the recovery of meaning, of values, and of contact with the sacred represents a relevant path for confronting contemporary malaise, requiring of the psychologist the integration of philosophical, spiritual, and anthropological dimensions into clinical practice.