Remote Viewing with and without controlled Out-Of-Body Consciousness
Luciano Pederzoli, Elena Prati, Arianna Ballati, Patrizio Tressoldi
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Case study Case report |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 4 |
| Population | Four participants selected for their experience in reaching an Out-of-Body state via hypnotic induction |
| Key findings | Correct information averaged 55% in ordinary-state Remote Viewing and 54% in the Out-of-Body condition, with incorrect information at 35% in both and 14% of content identical across conditions. Three of four participants had more correct and fewer incorrect responses in the Out-of-Body condition. The authors argue this illustrates the possibility of using hypnotically induced Out-of-Body Remote Viewing to obtain information about unknown locations. |
Abstract
Four participants, chosen for their experience in reaching an Out-of-Body state of consciousness via hypnotic induction, were asked to describe five different and unknown locations, at first using Remote Viewing conditions in an ordinary state of consciousness and then again using Remote Viewing in Out-of-Body state of consciousness. According to an assessment by two independent judges, the average percentages of information obtained in Remote Viewing were 55% for those correct and 35% for those wrong, while in Out-of-Body they were 54% and 35% respectively. The average percentage of identical information to both conditions was 14%. Furthermore, three out of four participants obtained a higher percentage of correct answers and a lower percentage of incorrect answers in the OB-RV condition.This study illustrates the possibility of also using Remote Viewing in an Out-of-Body state of consciousness that is induced and controlled via hypnosis to obtain accurate information about unknown locations in an unconventional way.