Follow‐up on the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency's (CIA) remote viewing experiments☆
Álex Escolà-Gascón, James Houran, Neil Dagnall, Kenneth Graham Drinkwater, Andrew Denovan
Brain and Behavior May 3, 2023 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3026 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Quasi-experimental study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 634 |
| Population | Adults: 347 nonbelievers in psychic experiences and 287 believers in psychic experiences |
| Measures | Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test, hit rates on psi-RV task |
| Citations | 6 |
| Key findings | RV hits were nonsignificant among nonbelievers but significant among believers, where emotional intelligence predicted 19.5% of hits with small-to-moderate effect sizes (0.457–0.853). The authors propose the Production-Identification-Comprehension (PIC) emotional model, arguing that emotions during RV sessions may play an important role in producing anomalous cognitions and could enhance RV test success. |
Abstract
Objectives: Since 1972, the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) commissioned several research programs on remote viewing (RV) that were progressively declassified from 1995 to 2003. The main objectives of this research were to statistically replicate the original findings and address the question: What are the underlying cognitive mechanisms involved in RV? The research focused on emotional intelligence (EI) theory and intuitive information processing as possible hypothetical mechanisms.
Methods: We used a quasi-experimental design with new statistical control techniques based on structural equation modeling, analysis of invariance, and forced-choice experiments to accurately objectify results. We measured emotional intelligence with the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test. A total of 347 participants who were nonbelievers in psychic experiences completed an RV experiment using targets based on location coordinates. A total of 287 participants reported beliefs in psychic experiences and completed another RV experiment using targets based on images of places. Moreover, we divided the total sample into further subsamples for the purpose of replicating the findings and also used different thresholds on standard deviations to test for variation in effect sizes. The hit rates on the psi-RV task were contrasted with the estimated chance.
Results: The results of our first group analysis were nonsignificant, but the analysis applied to the second group produced significant RV-related effects corresponding to the positive influence of EI (i.e., hits in the RV experiments were 19.5% predicted from EI) with small to moderate effect sizes (between 0. 457 and 0.853).
Conclusions: These findings have profound implications for a new hypothesis of anomalous cognitions relative to RV protocols. Emotions perceived during RV sessions may play an important role in the production of anomalous cognitions. We propose the Production-Identification-Comprehension (PIC) emotional model as a function of behavior that could enhance VR test success.
Citations in the library
Cites 14
- A Rasch scaling validation of a ‘core’ near‐death experience British Journal of Psychology May 1, 2004
- Feeling the future: A meta-analysis of 90 experiments on the anomalous anticipation of random future events F1000Research January 29, 2016
- Why Most Research Findings About Psi Are False: The Replicability Crisis, the Psi Paradox and the Myth of Sisyphus Frontiers in Psychology September 18, 2020
- The experience of altered states of consciousness in shamanic ritual: the role of pre-existing beliefs and affective factors. Consciousness and Cognition December 1, 2010
- Conceptual and clinical implications of a “Haunted People Syndrome”. Spirituality in Clinical Practice March 18, 2021
and 9 more in the library