Modelling Subjective Consciousness: A Guide for the Perplexed
P. Burgess
Journal of Consciousness Studies July 14, 2022 DOI: 10.53765/20512201.29.7.032 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that no single monistic theory is likely to solve the problem of subjective consciousness; instead, theories should be treated as scientific models that apply only under certain empirical conditions and each explain a necessary aspect of consciousness. Proposes a pluralistic approach and the application of scientific perspectivism to models of consciousness. |
Abstract
This paper challenges the conventional methodological tendencies of current monistic treatments of subjective consciousness (SC). I argue that it is highly unlikely that any one position will 'solve' the SC problem, as monism supposes. Instead, I argue for treating theories of SC akin to scientific models, that (like models) theories only apply under certain empirical conditions, where each simply explains a necessary aspect of SC. Hence, a pluralistic, rather than monistic, approach is preferable to the literature as a whole. In lieu of conventional metaphysics, I advocate applying a form of scientific realism to models of SC, scientific perspectivism. As authors must rely on some intuitive and/or experiential description of what is problematic about SC, theories are better treated as models deriving from a plurality of interpretive perspectives.
Citations in the library
Cites 4
- On a confusion about a function of consciousness Behavioral and Brain Sciences June 1, 1995
- Two neural correlates of consciousness Trends in Cognitive Sciences January 13, 2005
- Exaggerated reports: reply to Block Analysis May 16, 2011
- Abusing the notion of what-it's-like-ness: A response to Block Analysis May 16, 2011