Skip to content

Modelling Subjective Consciousness: A Guide for the Perplexed

P. Burgess

Journal of Consciousness Studies July 14, 2022 DOI: 10.53765/20512201.29.7.032 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that no single monistic theory is likely to solve the problem of subjective consciousness; instead, theories should be treated as scientific models that apply only under certain empirical conditions and each explain a necessary aspect of consciousness. Proposes a pluralistic approach and the application of scientific perspectivism to models of consciousness.

Abstract

This paper challenges the conventional methodological tendencies of current monistic treatments of subjective consciousness (SC). I argue that it is highly unlikely that any one position will 'solve' the SC problem, as monism supposes. Instead, I argue for treating theories of SC akin to scientific models, that (like models) theories only apply under certain empirical conditions, where each simply explains a necessary aspect of SC. Hence, a pluralistic, rather than monistic, approach is preferable to the literature as a whole. In lieu of conventional metaphysics, I advocate applying a form of scientific realism to models of SC, scientific perspectivism. As authors must rely on some intuitive and/or experiential description of what is problematic about SC, theories are better treated as models deriving from a plurality of interpretive perspectives.

Citations in the library

Explore topics