Prefrontal Cortex and Consciousness: Beware of the Signals.
Theofanis I. Panagiotaropoulos, Abhilash Dwarakanath, Vishal Kapoor
Trends in Cognitive Sciences May 1, 2020 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.005 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Commentary Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | The authors agree with Block that dissociating neural correlates of consciousness from cognition is necessary, but argue that his interpretation of Brascamp et al.'s unreportable-transition findings is questionable and that his criticism of their no-report prefrontal recordings as merely postperceptual is unwarranted. |
Abstract
During binocular rivalry (BR), incongruent, unchanged visual stimulation induces intrinsically generated transitions in conscious content. Due to this astonishing property, BR is commonly combined with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) or single neuron recordings to identify the neural correlates of consciousness (NCCs); namely, brain activity reflecting conscious contents and spontaneous transitions between them. No-report BR versions, where the perceived stimulus is decoded from objective markers like reflexive eye movements instead of active behavioral reports, can be used to discard activity related to motor and postperceptual processes that might contaminate the pure NCC. This is especially relevant for resolving an ongoing theoretical debate about the role of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and posterior cortical areas in consciousness. Block recently suggested that no-report might still fail to eliminate postperceptual cognitive processes accompanying BR [1,2]. This could result in neural signals being incorrectly interpreted as reflecting conscious contents, under the strong assumption that postperceptual processes are systematically aligned to each of the competing percepts. He therefore calls for the development of no-post perceptual cognition paradigms and highlights the BR paradigm of Brascamp et al. [3], that uses unreportable transitions, to address this problem.We agree with Block that dissociating the NCCs from cognition is necessary. However, we caution against (i) Block’s interpretation of the Brascamp et al. findings; and (ii) the criticism that our recent recordings during no-report BR in the PFC reflect postperceptual cognitive processing and show no evidence of transition processes.
Citations in the library
Cited by 13
- Decoding rapidly presented visual stimuli from prefrontal ensembles without report nor post-perceptual processing. Neuroscience of Consciousness 2022
- Quality space computations for consciousness Trends in Cognitive Sciences July 17, 2024
- Neural evidence that perception is nonconceptual February 16, 2023
- Distinct electrophysiological correlates of low- and high-level visual consciousness with minimized post-perceptual processing iScience October 17, 2026
- Neuroscience undermines the higher-order theorists’ preferred solution to the targetless HOT problem Philosophical Psychology February 15, 2026
and 8 more in the library
Cites 4
- Why and how access consciousness can account for phenomenal consciousness. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences September 19, 2018
- Phenomenal consciousness and cognitive access. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences September 19, 2018
- Bistability of prefrontal states gates access to consciousness bioRxiv Preprint Server January 29, 2020
- Decoding the contents of consciousness from prefrontal ensembles bioRxiv Preprint Server January 28, 2020