Skip to content

Neuroscience undermines the higher-order theorists’ preferred solution to the targetless HOT problem

Benjamin Kozuch

Philosophical Psychology February 15, 2026 DOI: 10.1080/09515089.2026.2629514 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that current neuroimaging evidence and functional considerations challenge the dominant version of the Higher-Order Theory, in which the higher-order state supplies the content of conscious experience. If prefrontal cortex activity is constitutive of consciousness, the author contends, it enables consciousness of content represented in visual areas rather than supplying that content, and HOT research should focus more on the version in which the first-order state supplies the content of visual experience.

Abstract

The Higher-Order Theory (HOT) of consciousness holds that mental states become conscious when they are represented by another mental state. Most HOT theorists maintain that it is the higher-order, rather than the lower-order, state that supplies the content of conscious experience. This view entails that, for a state to become conscious, its content must be represented in the brain regions that produce higher-order states, which are widely thought to be in the Prefrontal Cortex (PFC). This article argues that this creates a challenge for HOT: current neuroimaging evidence and functional considerations suggest that, if PFC activity is constitutive of consciousness, it enables the consciousness of content represented in visual areas rather than supplying the content itself. The conclusion will be that HOT research should focus more on developing the version in which the first-order state supplies the content of visual experience.

Citations in the library