Skip to content

Event-related potential and behavioural differences in affective self-referential processing in long-term meditators versus controls.

Sucharit Katyal, Greg Hajcak, Tamara Flora, Austin Bartlett, Philippe R. Goldin

Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience April 1, 2020 DOI: 10.3758/s13415-020-00771-y (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional study Peer reviewed
Population Long-term meditators and age-matched meditation-naïve control participants
Measures self-referential encoding task (SRET), event-related potentials (ERP), late-positive potential (LPP)
Topics Meditation
Keywords Brain Humans Electroencephalography Cross-sectional studies Emotions Affect Self concept Evoked potentials Adult Middle aged Female EEG Erp Self-reference Sret Late-positive potential
Key findings Meditators endorsed more pleasant and fewer unpleasant words as self-referential than controls. Controls showed a larger early late-positive-potential response to unpleasant versus pleasant words, whereas meditators showed no difference between the two. The authors suggest long-term meditation training may support a more flexible and healthy relationship to the self.

Abstract

Contemplative practices are thought to modify one's experience of self and fundamentally change self-referential processing. However, few studies have examined the brain correlates of self-referential processing in long-term meditators. Here, we used the self-referential encoding task (SRET) to examine event-related potentials (ERP) during assessment of pleasant and unpleasant self-views in long-term meditators versus age-matched meditation-naïve control participants. Compared with controls, meditators endorsed significantly more pleasant and fewer unpleasant words as self-referential. We also found a between-group difference in the early component of the late-positive-potential (LPP) of the ERP characterized by a larger response to unpleasant versus pleasant words in controls and no difference in meditators. A cross-sectional design, such as the one used in the present study, has certain caveats like self-selectivity bias. If such caveats did not affect our results, these findings suggest that a long-term contemplative lifestyle, of which meditation training is an integral part, alters self-referential processing towards a more adaptive view of self and neural equivalence towards pleasant and unpleasant self-views. These findings suggest that long-term meditation training may affect brain and behavioural mechanism that support a more flexible and healthy relationship to one's self.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups 2008 Cross-sectional study
Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling Adult participants 2007 Observational cross-sectional n = 27
Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents 2011 Cross-sectional validation study n = 1,413
Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 152
Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates 2008 Cross-sectional, correlational

Citations in the library

Cited by 5

Cites 17

and 12 more in the library

Explore topics