Skip to content

Motivation Will Forever Restrict the Scalability of Universal School-based Mindfulness Interventions for Adolescents

Brian M. Galla

PsyArXiv May 18, 2023 preprint DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/c95ky (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Randomized
Topics Meditation
Key points Argues that universal school-based mindfulness interventions are limited by the high motivational commitment meditation requires, since adolescents often report low engagement and many trials have not improved mental health. Proposes that universal programs drop meditation and instead instill contemplative viewpoints, reserving mindfulness skill training for adolescents who want to meditate.

Abstract

In this essay, I argue that the scalability and effectiveness of universal school-based mindfulness interventions for adolescents will always be limited by the high motivational commitment required to meditate. Mindfulness interventions rely on a single and demanding health behavior—namely, meditation—to cultivate mindfulness skills. But unlike traditional mindfulness interventions delivered in clinics to self-selected adults who are motivated to manage personal problems through meditation, universal school-based mindfulness interventions are delivered to all adolescents regardless of their desire to meditate. I review evidence from multiple randomized controlled trials of universal school-based mindfulness interventions to show that adolescents consistently report low engagement in meditation, and that many interventions have so far failed to improve adolescents’ mental health. I propose that universal mindfulness interventions eliminate meditation entirely and focus on instilling contemplative viewpoints conducive to flourishing, and that the skill of mindfulness is only taught to adolescents who want to meditate.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on meditation, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics