Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going with Mindfulness in Schools?
Katherine Weare
Mindfulness February 1, 2023 DOI: 10.1007/s12671-023-02086-8 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Commentary Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Meditation |
| Key points | The commentary endorses the argument that mindfulness in schools should shift from a clinically based "mindfulness in education" model, treating mindfulness as a discrete "intervention" criticized as mechanistic and atomistic, toward "mindfulness as education," a transformative "process" within whole-school, ecological approaches that cultivate compassion and learner agency. It adds that teacher development should be central, that rigour and innovation must be balanced, that non-Anglo-centric examples should be considered, and that advice on universal approaches and who teaches mindfulness should await longer-term reviews of the MYRIAD project's unexpected results. |
Abstract
Abstract: This is a commentary on a paper by Roeser et al. entitled “Beyond all splits: Envisioning the next generation of science on mindfulness and compassion in schools for students”. The commentary endorses the main thrust of paper, the need to re-envisage mindfulness and move from the dominant model, a clinically based “mindfulness in education” approach, in which mindfulness is seen as a discrete “intervention”, an approach which has been criticised as mechanistic, atomistic, and restrictive and encourages a view of mindfulness as helping people to cope with a stressful status quo. The commentary further endorses the view that we need to create and research models of “mindfulness as education”, as a transformative “process” models which focus on the relational and developmental aspects of education, within a whole-school, ecological approach, encouraging schools to become more compassionate places, which cultivate a positive sense of agency in learners to empower them to change the social context. As well as endorsing the main thrust of the paper, this commentary includes the following further comments. Research and practice on teacher development needs to be at the heart of this process. Getting the balance right between rigour and innovation in research will be an ongoing process. It would be helpful to look outside Anglo-centric box for examples of this relational shift. We should wait to see how the somewhat unexpected results of the MYRIAD project feed into longer term reviews before changing advice around universal approaches and who should teach mindfulness in schools.
Citations in the library
Cited by 6
- The Mindful Way From Information to Knowledge, to Wisdom, and to Life: Perspectives on Mindfulness (-Based Cognitive Therapy) for Higher Education. Mindfulness 2025
- School-based mindfulness: Application of the PARiHS framework to contextualize implementation. Journal of school psychology April 1, 2025
- Enaction, relevance realisation and wisdom: establishing a theoretical framework for contemplative education Frontiers in Education October 10, 2025
- Developing a School-based Mindfulness Intervention for Delivery in Rwanda and Ethiopia: Cultural Adaptation through Knotworking Research Square July 13, 2026
- You Can Lead an Adolescent to Mindfulness, but You Can’t Make Them Mindful Mindfulness July 1, 2024
and 1 more in the library
Cites 4
- What defines mindfulness-based programs? The warp and the weft Psychological Medicine December 29, 2016
- Beyond All Splits: Envisioning the Next Generation of Science on Mindfulness and Compassion in Schools for Students. Mindfulness November 11, 2022
- Effectiveness of universal school-based mindfulness training compared with normal school provision on teacher mental health and school climate: results of the MYRIAD cluster randomised controlled trial. Evidence-Based Mental Health July 12, 2022
- Mindfulness and contemplative approaches in education. Current Opinion in Psychology August 1, 2019