A new perspective and assessment measure for common dissociative experiences: 'Felt Sense of Anomaly'.
Emma Černis, Esther Beierl, Andrew Molodynski, Anke Ehlers, Daniel K. Freeman
PLoS One February 24, 2021 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247037 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Scale development and validation study (systematic review, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis) Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 8,861 |
| Population | 8,861 online self-report respondents (non-clinical) and 1,031 patients with psychosis |
| Measures | Černis Felt Sense of Anomaly (ČEFSA) scale, Dissociative Experiences Scale-II (DES-II), PTSD measure |
| Keywords | Humans Factor analysis, statistical Dissociative disorders Psychometrics Self report |
| Key findings | The authors argue that a subset of dissociative experiences shares a core feature they term 'felt sense of anomaly' (FSA), which factor analysis indicated manifests in seven ways (anomalous experiences of self, body, and emotion, and altered senses of familiarity, connection, agency, and reality). The resulting measure showed adequate fit in both non-clinical and psychosis groups, with strong convergent validity with the DES-II (r = 0.802) and high reliability. |
Abstract
Background: Dissociative experiences occur across a range of mental health disorders. However, the term 'dissociation' has long been argued to lack conceptual clarity and may describe several distinct phenomena. We therefore aimed to conceptualise and empirically establish a discrete subset of dissociative experiences and develop a corresponding assessment measure.
Methods: First, a systematic review of existing measures was carried out to identify themes across dissociative experiences. A theme of 'Felt Sense of Anomaly' (FSA) emerged. Second, assessment items were generated based on this construct and a measure developed using exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory (CFA) factor analyses of 8861 responses to an online self-report survey. Finally, the resulting measure was validated via CFA with data from 1031 patients with psychosis.
Results: 'Felt sense of anomaly' (FSA) was identified as common to many dissociative experiences, affecting several domains (e.g. body) and taking different forms ('types'; e.g. unfamiliarity). Items for a novel measure were therefore systematically generated using a conceptual framework whereby each item represented a type-by-domain interaction (e.g. 'my body feels unfamiliar'). Factor analysis of online responses found that FSA-dissociation manifested in seven ways: anomalous experiences of the self, body, and emotion, and altered senses of familiarity, connection, agency, and reality (Χ2 (553) = 4989.435, p<0.001, CFI = 0.929, TLI = 0.924, RMSEA = 0.052, SRMR = 0.047). Additionally, a single-factor 'global FSA' scale was produced (Χ2 (9) = 312.350, p<0.001, CFI = 0.970, TLI = 0.950, RMSEA = 0.107, SRMR = 0.021). Model fit was adequate in the clinical (psychosis) group (Χ2 (553) = 1623.641, p<0.001, CFI = 0.927, TLI = 0.921, RMSEA = 0.043, SRMR = 0.043). The scale had good convergent validity with a widely used dissociation scale (DES-II) (non-clinical: r = 0.802), excellent internal reliability (non-clinical: Cronbach's alpha = 0.98; clinical: Cronbach's alpha = 0.97), and excellent test-retest reliability (non-clinical: ICC = 0.92). Further, in non-clinical respondents scoring highly on a PTSD measure, CFA confirmed adequate model fit (Χ2 (553) = 4758.673, CFI = 0.913, TLI = 0.906, RMSEA = 0.052, SRMR = 0.054).
Conclusions: The Černis Felt Sense of Anomaly (ČEFSA) scale is a novel measure of a subset of dissociative experiences that share a core feature of FSA. It is psychometrically robust in both non-clinical and psychosis groups.
Citations in the library
Cited by 2
- Pharmacological modelling of dissociation and psychosis: an evaluation of the Clinician Administered Dissociative States Scale and Psychotomimetic States Inventory during nitrous oxide (‘laughing gas’)-induced anomalous states Psychopharmacology March 26, 2022
- How-To Study Dissociative Symptoms in a Broad Range of Mental Disorders: A Methodological Primer Journal of Trauma & Dissociation April 7, 2025