Describing the indescribable: A qualitative study of dissociative experiences in psychosis
Emma Černis, Daniel K. Freeman, Anke Ehlers
PLoS One February 19, 2020 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229091 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Qualitative study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 12 |
| Population | NHS patients with non-affective psychosis diagnoses and experience of dissociation |
| Key findings | Participants described dissociation as a distressing experience of subjective strangeness, unreality, disconnection, and perceptual shifts that affected mental health, daily functioning, and social connection. They found it very difficult to describe and often did not disclose it, and when they did, reported being misunderstood and receiving no dissociation-specific support. The authors argue the core experience is a felt sense of anomaly and recommend clinicians proactively ask about it. |
Abstract
Background: Despite its long history, dissociation remains under-recognised clinically, partly due to difficulties identifying dissociative symptoms. Qualitative research may support its recognition by providing a lived experience perspective. In non-affective psychosis, identification of dissociation may be particularly important given that such experiences have been implicated its development and maintenance. Therefore, this study aimed to understand in the context of psychosis: what it is like to experience dissociation; the impact dissociation might have; what factors begin, maintain or end dissociative experiences; and what beliefs people hold about dissociation.
Methods: Qualitative interviews were carried out with twelve NHS patients with non-affective psychosis diagnoses and experience of dissociation. Data were analysed using Thematic Analysis.
Results: Dissociation involves subjective strangeness, unreality, disconnection, and shifts in perception. It impacts on mental health (including psychotic experiences), daily functioning, emotional connection, and can lead to social withdrawal. Stress, fatigue, and excessive internal focus may be involved in development and maintenance. Participants found it very difficult to describe the experience of dissociation, and, as a result, often did not mention it to others. Even when shared, interviewees reported that their descriptions were misunderstood and therefore they did not receive information or support specific to dissociation. The consensus was that experiences of dissociation are negative, but that understanding them better helped to enable coping.
Conclusions: The core subjective experience of dissociation appears to be a felt sense of anomaly (FSA), and we therefore suggest clinicians proactively enquire about such experiences. Dissociation is distressing, and has multiple impacts, but can easily be overlooked due to difficulties describing it and behavioural similarities to negative psychotic symptoms such as withdrawal.
Citations in the library
Cited by 7
- The experience and role of dissociation in psychosis following developmental trauma: A systematic review Clinical Psychology Review February 26, 2025
- Dissociative experiences in individuals with subclinical psychosis and a history of developmental trauma: a qualitative study. European Journal of Psychotraumatology December 1, 2025
- Dissociation and recovery in psychosis - an overview of the literature. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2024
- Are dissociative psychosis and dissociative schizophrenia reality? World Journal of Psychiatry April 19, 2025
- Testing the trauma and Social Pathways model of psychosis as a predictor of unusual sensory experiences Psychosis January 30, 2025
and 2 more in the library