Skip to content

The Perceptual Awareness Scale-recent controversies and debates.

Morten Overgaard, Kristian Sandberg

Neuroscience of Consciousness December 15, 2021 DOI: 10.1093/nc/niab044 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Review Peer reviewed
Measures Perceptual Awareness Scale (PAS)
Keywords Methodology Consciousness Perception Pas Subjective report
Key findings The authors review the intended use of the Perceptual Awareness Scale and findings from its first decade, updated with recent empirical and theoretical developments. They address whether consciousness is gradual or all-or-none, what should be classified as conscious versus unconscious, and whether PAS is preferable to alternative awareness measures, and they respond to selected recent critiques.

Abstract

Accurate insight into subjective experience is crucial for the science of consciousness. The Perceptual Awareness Scale (PAS) was created in 2004 as a method for obtaining precise introspective reports for participants in research projects, and since then, the scale has become increasingly popular. This does not mean, of course, that no critiques have been voiced. Here, we briefly recapitulate our main thoughts on the intended PAS usage and the findings of the first decade, and we update this with the latest empirical and theoretical developments. We focus specifically on findings with relevance to whether consciousness is gradual or all-or-none phenomenon, to what should be considered conscious/unconscious, and to whether PAS is preferable to alternative measures of awareness. We respond in detail to some recent, selected articles.

Citations in the library