The CannTeen Study: Verbal Episodic Memory, Spatial Working Memory, and Response Inhibition in Adolescent and Adult Cannabis Users and Age-Matched Controls PRE-PRINT
Will Lawn, Natalia Fernandez‐Vinson, Claire Mokrysz, Georgia Hogg, Rachel Lees, Katie Trinci, Kat Petrilli, Anna Borissova, Shelan Ofori, Shona Waters, Paulina Michor, Matthew B. Wall, Tom P. Freeman, Val Curran
February 18, 2022 preprint DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/zw24a (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Cross-sectional study |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 274 |
| Population | Adolescent cannabis users (n=76; 16-17 years) and controls (n=63), and adult cannabis users (n=71; 26-29 years) and controls (n=64) |
| Intervention | Cannabis |
| Measures | prose recall task, spatial n-back task, stop-signal task |
| Topics | Cannabis |
| Key findings | Chronic cannabis use was associated with poorer verbal episodic memory compared with controls, but not with spatial working memory or response inhibition. No significant age-group by user-group interactions were found, so the authors did not find evidence for heightened adolescent vulnerability to cannabis-related cognitive impairment. |
Abstract
Background: Preclinical and human studies suggest that adolescent cannabis use may be associated with worse cognitive outcomes than adult cannabis use. We investigated the associations between chronic cannabis use and cognitive function in adolescent and adult cannabis users and controls. We hypothesised user-status would be negatively associated with cognitive function and this relationship would be stronger in adolescents than adults.Methods: As part of the ‘CannTeen’ project, this cross-sectional study assessed cognitive performance in adolescent cannabis users (n=76; 16-17-year-olds), adolescent controls (n=63), adult cannabis users (n=71; 26-29-year-olds) and adult controls (n=64). Users used cannabis 1-7 days/week. Verbal episodic memory (VEM) was assessed using the prose recall task, spatial working memory (SWM) was assessed using the spatial n-back task, and response inhibition was assessed with the stop-signal task. Primary outcome variables were: delayed recall, 3-back discriminability, and stop signal reaction time, respectively.Results: Users had worse VEM than controls (F(1,268)=7.423, p=0.007). There were no significant differences between user-groups on SWM or response inhibition. Null differences were supported by Bayesian analyses. No significant interactions between age-group and user-group were found for VEM, SWM, or response inhibition.
Conclusions: Consistent with previous research, there was an association between chronic cannabis use and poorer VEM, but chronic cannabis use was not associated with SWM or response inhibition. We did not find evidence for heightened adolescent vulnerability to cannabis-related cognitive impairment.
Comparable studies
Other cross-sectional and survey studies on cannabis, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patterns of simultaneous polysubstance use in drug using university students Drug-using university students | 2006 | Cross-sectional survey | n = 149 |
| Persisting Reductions in Cannabis, Opioid, and Stimulant Misuse After Naturalistic Psychedelic Use: An Online Survey Online survey respondents | 2020 | Cross-sectional survey | |
| User perceptions of the benefits and harms of hallucinogenic drug use: A web-based questionnaire study Users of hallucinogenic drugs who completed a web-based questionnaire | 2010 | Cross-sectional survey | n = 600 |
| Illicit Use of LSD or Psilocybin, but not MDMA or Nonpsychedelic Drugs, is Associated with Mystical Experiences in a Dose-Dependent Manner Adults recruited from the MAPS website and newsletter, most reporting use of various... | 2012 | Cross-sectional survey | n = 337 |
| Ecstasy and Drug Consumption Patterns: A Canadian Rave Population Study Rave attendees in Montreal, Quebec | 2002 | Cross-sectional survey | n = 210 |