Psychopathological symptoms associated with synthetic cannabinoid use: a comparison with natural cannabis.
Vincent T Mensen, Annabel Vreeker, Johan Nordgren, Amanda Atkinson, Rafael de la Torre, Magí Farré, Johannes G. Ramaekers, Tibor M Brunt
Psychopharmacology April 9, 2019 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-019-05238-8 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Observational cross-sectional survey Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 367 |
| Population | Adult users of synthetic cannabinoids or natural cannabis recruited online |
| Measures | Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Altman Mania Scale (Altman), Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) |
| Topics | Cannabis |
| Keywords | Humans Marijuana abuse Cannabinoids Marijuana smoking Mental disorders Psychopathology Adolescent Middle aged Europe Female Young adult Surveys and questionnaires Synthetic drugs Isi Mental health Spice Bsi Dudit Synthetic cannabis Altman |
| Key findings | Synthetic cannabinoid users scored higher than natural cannabis users on all psychometric measures, indicating greater likelihood of drug abuse, sleep problems, (hypo)manic symptoms, and all nine Brief Symptom Inventory dimensions. Odds ratios for SC versus NC users were 3.56 for drug dependence, 5.01 for severe insomnia, 5.18 for (hypo-)mania, and 5.21 for BSI psychopathology. The authors conclude SC use is associated with increased mental health symptomatology compared with NC use. |
Abstract
Background: Synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) are a class of new psychoactive substances that have been rapidly evolving around the world throughout recent years. Many different synthetic cannabinoid analogues are on the consumer market and sold under misleading names, like "spice" or "incense." A limited number of studies have reported serious health effects associated with SC use. In this study, we compared clinical and subclinical psychopathological symptoms associated with SC use and natural cannabis (NC) use.
Methods: A convenience sample of 367 NC and SC users was recruited online, including four validated psychometric questionnaires: The Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Altman Mania Scale (Altman), and Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). The two groups were compared with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and covariance (ANCOVA), chi2 tests, and logistic regression when appropriate.
Results: The SC user group did not differ in age from the NC user group (27.7 years), but contained less females (21% and 30%, respectively). SC users scored higher than NC users on all used psychometric measures, indicating a higher likelihood of drug abuse, sleep problems, (hypo)manic symptoms, and the nine dimensions comprising the BSI, somatization, obsessive-compulsive behavior, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism. Odds ratios (95% CI) for the SC user group vs NC user group were, respectively, drug dependence 3.56 (1.77-7.16), (severe) insomnia 5.01 (2.10-11.92), (hypo-)mania 5.18 (2.04-13.14), and BSI psychopathology 5.21 (2.96-9.17).
Discussion: This study shows that SC use is associated with increased mental health symptomatology compared to NC use.
Comparable studies
Other cross-sectional and survey studies on cannabis, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cannabis use before age 15 and subsequent executive functioning 104 chronic cannabis users (49 early-onset before age 15, 55 late-onset after age 15)... | 2011 | Observational cross-sectional study | n = 148 |
| Patterns of simultaneous polysubstance use in drug using university students Drug-using university students | 2006 | Cross-sectional survey | n = 149 |
| Persisting Reductions in Cannabis, Opioid, and Stimulant Misuse After Naturalistic Psychedelic Use: An Online Survey Online survey respondents | 2020 | Cross-sectional survey | |
| User perceptions of the benefits and harms of hallucinogenic drug use: A web-based questionnaire study Users of hallucinogenic drugs who completed a web-based questionnaire | 2010 | Cross-sectional survey | n = 600 |
| Illicit Use of LSD or Psilocybin, but not MDMA or Nonpsychedelic Drugs, is Associated with Mystical Experiences in a Dose-Dependent Manner Adults recruited from the MAPS website and newsletter, most reporting use of various... | 2012 | Cross-sectional survey | n = 337 |
Citations in the library
Cited by 4
- Designer drugs: mechanism of action and adverse effects Archives of Toxicology April 1, 2020
- Acute and long-term psychiatric consequences of synthetic cannabinoids and related novel psychoactive substances: A systematic review. Psychiatry Research February 1, 2026
- Cannabis and psychopathology: 2024 Snapshot of a meandering journey Indian Journal of Psychiatry March 1, 2025
- Different Effects of Cannabis Abuse on Adolescent and Adult Brain. Pharmacology 2020
Cites 13
- Traditional marijuana, high‐potency cannabis and synthetic cannabinoids: increasing risk for psychosis World Psychiatry September 22, 2016
- Novel psychoactive substances of interest for psychiatry World Psychiatry February 1, 2016
- Instability of the ecstasy market and a new kid on the block: mephedrone Journal of Psychopharmacology September 8, 2010
- Monitoring new psychoactive substances (NPS) in The Netherlands: data from the drug market and the Poisons Information Centre. Drug and Alcohol Dependence February 1, 2015
- 4-Bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine (2C-B): presence in the recreational drug market in Spain, pattern of use and subjective effects. Journal of Psychopharmacology July 1, 2012
and 8 more in the library