Skip to content

Propofol for treatment resistant depression: A randomized controlled trial

Scott C. Tadler, Keith Jones, Carter Lybbert, Jason C. Huang, Rana Jawish, Daniela Solzbacher, Ellen Kendrick, Matthew D. Pierson, Kamile Weischedel, Noreen Rana, Rebecca Jacobs, Lily C. Vonesh, Daniel Feldman, Claire Larson, Nathan Hoffman, Jacob E. Jessop, Adam L. Larson, Norman E. Taylor, David H. Odell, Kai Kück, Brian J Mickey

medRxiv September 15, 2023 preprint DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.12.23294678 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Randomized controlled trial Open-label
Sample size 24
Population Adults with moderate-to-severe treatment-resistant depression
Intervention Propofol
Dose low dose versus high dose evoking electroencephalographic burst suppression, guided by real-time processed frontal EEG
Duration Series of 6 treatments
Measures 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-24), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Topics Depression
Citations 7
Registration NCT03684447
Key findings Propofol produced larger reductions in depression scores at a high dose evoking EEG burst suppression than at a low dose: HDRS-24 fell 9.3 points (33%) versus 5.3 points (17%), and PHQ-9 fell 4.8 versus 2.0 points. Neither between-group difference reached statistical significance (p=0.24 and p=0.09), though the authors suggest the medium-sized effects indicate possible dose-dependent antidepressant action.

Abstract

Background: Anesthetic agents including ketamine and nitrous oxide have shown antidepressant properties when appropriately dosed. Our recent open-label trial of propofol, an intravenous anesthetic known to elicit transient positive mood effects, suggested that it may also produce robust and durable antidepressant effects when administered at a high dose that elicits an electroencephalographic (EEG) burst-suppression state. Here we report findings from a randomized controlled trial ( NCT03684447 ) that compared two doses of propofol. We hypothesized greater improvement with a high dose that evoked burst suppression versus a low dose that did not.

Methods: Participants with moderate-to-severe, treatment-resistant depression were randomized to a series of 6 treatments at low versus high dose (n=12 per group). Propofol infusions were guided by real-time processed frontal EEG to achieve predetermined pharmacodynamic criteria. The primary and secondary depression outcome measures were the 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-24) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), respectively. Secondary scales measured suicidal ideation, anxiety, functional impairment, and quality of life.

Results: Treatments were well tolerated and blinding procedures were effective. The mean [95%-CI] change in HDRS-24 score was -5.3 [-10.3, -0.2] for the low-dose group and -9.3 [-12.9, -5.6] for the high-dose group (17% versus 33% reduction). The between-group effect size (standardized mean difference) was -0.56 [-1.39, 0.28]. The group difference was not statistically significant (p=0.24, linear model). The mean change in PHQ-9 score was -2.0 [-3.9, -0.1] for the low dose and -4.8 [-7.7, -2.0] for the high dose. The between-group effect size was -0.73 [-1.59, 0.14] (p=0.09). Secondary outcomes favored the high dose (effect sizes magnitudes 0.1 - 0.9) but did not generally reach statistical significance (p>0.05).

Conclusions: The medium-sized effects observed between doses in this small, controlled, clinical trial suggest that propofol may have dose-dependent antidepressant effects. The findings also provide guidance for subsequent trials. A larger sample size and additional treatments in series are likely to enhance the ability to detect dose-dependent effects. Future work is warranted to investigate potential antidepressant mechanisms and dose optimization.

Comparable studies

Other randomized controlled trials on depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
A Randomized Trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate Antagonist in Treatment-Resistant Major Depression Subjects with DSM-IV major depression (treatment resistant) 2006 Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study n = 18
Prevention of relapse/recurrence in major depression by mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. Recovered recurrently depressed patients 2000 Randomized controlled trial n = 145
Psilocybin produces substantial and sustained decreases in depression and anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancer: A randomized double-blind trial Cancer patients with life-threatening diagnoses and symptoms of depression and/or anxiety 2016 Randomized controlled trial n = 51
Rapid and sustained symptom reduction following psilocybin treatment for anxiety and depression in patients with life-threatening cancer: a randomized controlled trial Patients with cancer-related anxiety and depression 2016 Double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial n = 29
Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Depression: Replication and Exploration of Differential Relapse Prevention Effects. Recovered recurrently depressed patients 2004 Randomized controlled trial n = 73

Citations in the library

Explore topics