Skip to content

Nietzsche’s Genealogie der Moral Pro and Contra Distributed Cognition

Emily T. Troscianko

Distributed Cognition in Victorian Culture and Modernism September 1, 2020 DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9781474442244.003.0012 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that Nietzsche's Genealogy of Morals expresses perspectivism through spatial and movement rhetoric that relies on embodied, enactive readerly imagining, while simultaneously undermining its own claim to discover an extra-textual moral reality through rhetorical structures that merely simulate movement. The author contends this equivocation bears on how readers engage rhetorical form with conceptual content and connects Nietzsche's thought to current debates about distributed cognition.

Abstract

Nietzsche’s writing and thought about the mind challenge some of the same Cartesian dichotomies that the more recent frameworks of 4E and distributed cognition do. Zur Genealogie der Moral (On the Genealogy of Morals), a highpoint in Nietzsche’s project of the ‘Umwertung aller Werte’ (revaluation of all values), is a proclamation of perspectivism: there is no objective perception and nothing objectively to be perceived, only perspectives on objects. This thesis is expressed through evocations of space and movement that, the chapter argues, promote and depend on readerly cognition in which embodied and enactive imagining is central. In these same passages, however, the equivocations underlying the whole perspectivist enterprise are exposed: the supposed discovery of a new extra-textual moral reality through philosophical agility is undermined by rhetorical structures that turn out to merely simulate movement, and so ask readers’ imaginations not to be too enactive. This equivocation has important consequences for readers’ engagement with the interplay of rhetorical form and conceptual content. Cognitive analysis thus gets us to the heart of a grand paradox of Nietzschean philosophy – absolute assertion of the relativity of language – while also shedding light on current questions about action-based distributed cognition as an intellectual force.