Skip to content

The fourth law of thermodynamics (LMEP) and cognition from first principles: commentary on Barrett’s “On the nature and origins of cognition as a form of motivated activity”

R. Swenson

Adaptive Behavior April 1, 2020 DOI: 10.1177/1059712319856536 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Commentary Peer reviewed
Key points The author supports Barrett's identification of central problems in enactivist and 4E cognitive theories and argues that LMEP (the Law of Maximum Entropy Production) and earlier thermodynamic work by the author and Micheal Turvey provide a pathway to a nomologically grounded theory of embodied, embedded, enactive, and extended cognition, which the author proposes as a robust alternative to the computationalist model, described as failed.

Abstract

Nat Barrett’s “On the nature and origins of cognition as a form of motivated activity” puts a well-focused light on the central problems, plaguing the core of enactivist, or 4E cognitive theories and points to LMEP (the Law of Maximum Entropy Production or the fourth law of thermodynamics) and the thermodynamic groundwork Micheal Turvey and I presented a little less than three decades ago as the pathway in. Here, I offer some brief remarks supporting his efforts as well as some clarifying points following from work done in the ensuing years. We are now at a point where we can dissolve the problems Barrett so cogently identifies and get us to a nomologically grounded theory of embodied, embedded, enactive, and extended cognition, a robust alternative to the failed computationalist model, from first principles.

Citations in the library