Skip to content

Philosophical Issues in Computational Cognitive Sciences

Mark Sprevak

Cambridge University Press eBooks April 21, 2023 DOI: 10.1017/9781108755610.043 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Citations 1
Key points The chapter reviews "no go" arguments holding that semantic content, phenomenal consciousness, and central reasoning may resist explanation or description in computational terms, and examines possible replies. It argues that these arguments differ from one another and have limitations, and suggests they could contribute to estimating the value of ongoing research programs in computational cognitive science.

Abstract

What counts as a philosophical issue in computational cognitive science? This chapter briefly reviews possible answers before focusing on a specific subset of philosophical issues. These surround challenges that have been raised by philosophers regarding the scope of computational models of cognition. The arguments suggest that there are aspects of human cognition that may, for various reasons, resist explanation or description in terms of computation. The primary targets of these “no go” arguments have been semantic content , phenomenal consciousness , and central reasoning . This chapter reviews the arguments and considers possible replies. It concludes by highlighting the differences between the arguments, their limitations, and how they might contribute to the wider project of estimating the value of ongoing research programs in computational cognitive science.

Citations in the library