Aphantasia and Conscious Thought
July 7, 2023 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198879466.003.0005 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper |
|---|---|
| Citations | 41 |
| Key points | Argues that aphantasia provides a counterexample to the sensory constraint on conscious thought, supporting the existence of a non-sensory phenomenology of thought that determines thought content. Proposes that disagreements over cognitive phenomenology may arise from interpersonal variation in mental imagery. |
Abstract
Abstract The sensory constraint on conscious thought says that if a thought is phenomenally conscious, its phenomenal properties must be reducible to some sensory phenomenal character. This chapter argues that the burgeoning psychological literature on aphantasia, an impoverishment in the ability to generate mental imagery, provides a counterexample to the sensory constraint. The best explanation of aphantasics’ introspective reports, neuroimaging, and task performance is that some aphantasics have conscious thoughts without sensory mental imagery. This argument against the sensory constraint supports the existence of a non-sensory phenomenology of thought. Moreover, this argument can be extended to show that this non-sensory phenomenology determines a thought content. Finally, it can potentially diagnose the disagreement over cognitive phenomenology in the philosophy of mind, as such disagreement may turn on interpersonal variation in mental imagery.
Citations in the library
Cited by 3
- Building the Blocks of Being: The Attributes and Qualities That Are Independently Required and Jointly Sufficient for Con-Sciousness Preprints.org March 1, 2023
- Does Cognitive Phenomenology Support Dualism? Canadian Journal of Philosophy July 1, 2023
- Building the Blocks of Being: The Attributes and Qualities Required for Consciousness Philosophies June 22, 2023