Skip to content

Recent empirical work on religious experience: New directions

Wes Skolits

Philosophy Compass April 30, 2024 DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12977 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that philosophical research on religious experience should prioritize empirical findings from neuroscience, psychology, and anthropology, rather than relying mainly on evolutionary psychology, and that non-paradigmatic religious experiences raise unique epistemological questions that deserve focused philosophical attention.

Abstract

Novel developments in neuroscience, psychology, and anthropology have spawned a thriving empirical literature on religious experience. Previous literature in the cognitive science of religion has largely ignored empirical results from these fields, focusing narrowly on results from evolutionary psychology. Additionally, it has ignored the epistemological relevance of non‐paradigmatic cases of religious experience discussed in the literature from these subspecialties. In this article I submit that philosophical research on religious experience should take empirical work outside of evolutionary psychology as its primary foci towards uncovering fresh perspectives. I focus on three different literatures from neuroscience, psychology, and anthropology as case studies for generating novel philosophical research. I show that empirically‐discovered factors related to non‐paradigmatic religious experiences raise crucial and unique epistemological questions.