Validation of a Tamil Version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Using Rasch Analysis.
Kalpana Raman, Richard J Siegert, Jaishankar Bharatharaj, Christian U. Krägeloh
Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine January 15, 2024 DOI: 10.1177/02537176231220564 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Psychometric validation study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 303 |
| Population | Adults over 18 with proficiency in Tamil and no history of significant neurological trauma and/or psychiatric history |
| Measures | Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), Tamil version (FFMQ-T) |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Psychometrics Rasch analysis Ffmq Tamil version |
| Key points | Iterative Rasch analysis could not resolve consistent misfit of the Observe facet items of the Tamil FFMQ. Using a subtest approach and deleting additional items from the remaining four facets, the authors obtained a final four-factor, 22-item FFMQ-T, which they conclude is usable and similar to the Hindi version. |
Abstract
Background: Various assessment tools that explore and assess mindfulness are available. Keeping in view both the origin of and the literature surrounding mindfulness assessment tools, this study aimed to evaluate the workability of one widely researched tool, the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), for establishing cross-cultural generalizability and utility in the Indian context.
Methods: We recruited 303 adults over 18 with proficiency in the Tamil language and no history of significant neurological trauma and/or psychiatric history. They completed a version of the 39-item FFMQ, which we had translated into Tamil (FFMQ-T). The psychometric properties of this scale were tested using the Partial-Credit model of Rasch analysis.
Results: Iterative Rasch analysis could not resolve consistent misfit of the Observe facet items. Using a subtest approach, a higher-order fit of the FFMQ-T could be achieved after the deletion of additional items from each of the remaining four facets. The resulting final model for the FFMQ-T questionnaire was a four-factor solution with 22 items.
Conclusions: This study concluded the usability of the new 22-item FFMQ-T. These results are not dissimilar to the other versions in similar populations, such as the Hindi version of the FFMQ. The ordinal-to-interval conversion tables provided here ensure that the FFMQ-T can be used with enhanced precision and parametric statistics.
Citations in the library
Cites 8
- The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003
- Using Self-Report Assessment Methods to Explore Facets of Mindfulness Assessment January 27, 2006
- Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Assessment February 29, 2008
- Prevention of relapse/recurrence in major depression by mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2000
- Assessment of Mindfulness by Self-Report Assessment September 1, 2004
and 3 more in the library