Skip to content

Rethinking Phenomenology of Health and Illness: An Alternative Interpretation.

Junguo Zhang

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine October 1, 2025 DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhaf013 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Philosophy of mind
Keywords Humans Disease Philosophy, medical Health Transparency Illness Normality The body
Key points Argues that a genetic-phenomenological reading of health and illness improves on Burch's static-phenomenological interpretation: illness experience involves subjectivity, intersubjectivity, and objectivity unified in structural interdependence, normality is both pregiven and constituted across subjective, intersubjective, and objective dimensions, and the lived body and physical body arise from complementary first-person and third-person perspectives, so bodily transparency and conspicuousness need not conflict.

Abstract

This paper critically evaluates Matthew Burch's interpretations and critiques of the phenomenological account of health and illness, which are predominantly situated within the realm of static phenomenology within Husserl's framework, thereby neglecting the potential insights offered by genetic phenomenology. The primary focus of this paper is to explore genetic phenomenology in order to present an alternative interpretation of PHI. It argues that illness experience involves subjectivity, intersubjectivity, and objectivity, unified within a structural interdependence. Additionally, normality comprises subjective, intersubjective, and objective dimensions, reflecting its multifaceted nature. It encompasses both a pregiven aspect and a constitutive process. Moreover, the distinction between the lived body and the physical body is a result of first-person subjectification and third-person objectification perspectives. These perspectives mutually complement and intertwine, where bodily transparency and bodily conspicuousness do not necessarily conflict.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on philosophy of mind, most cited first.

Explore topics