Skip to content

Pathology as a phenomenological tool.

Havi Carel

Continental Philosophy Review March 9, 2021 DOI: 10.1007/s11007-021-09538-9 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Philosophy of mind
Keywords Pathology Illness Husserl Epoché
Key points Argues that illness and pathology can function as a phenomenological method in their own right, not merely as objects of study. Claims that studying breakdown and "bodily doubt" is necessary for a complete account of embodiment, and draws an analogy between illness and Husserl's epoché as sources of distancing that motivate reflection.

Abstract

The phenomenological method (or rather, methods) has been fruitfully used to study the experience of illness in recent years. However, the role of illness is not merely that of a passive object for phenomenological scrutiny. I propose that illness, and pathology more generally, can be developed into a phenomenological method in their own right. I claim that studying cases of pathology, breakdown, and illness offer illumination not only of these experiences, but also of normal function and the tacit background that underpins it. In particular, I claim that the study of embodiment can be greatly enhanced, and indeed would be incomplete, without attending to bodily breakdown and what I term bodily doubt. I offer an analogy between illness and Husserl's epoché, suggesting that both are a source of distancing, and therefore motivate a reflective stance.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on philosophy of mind, most cited first.

Explore topics