Maladaptive daydreaming should be included as a dissociative disorder in psychiatric manuals: position paper
Nirit Soffer-Dudek, Eli Somer, David Spiegel, R. Chefetz, John A O'Neil, Martin J Dorahy, Etzel Cardeña, D. Mamah, A. Schimmenti, Alessandro Musetti, S. Boon, A. van Dijke, Colin A. Ross, E. Nijenhuis, A. Krause-Utz, Paul F. Dell, Steven N. Gold, Igor J. Pietkiewicz, J. Silberg, K. Steele, Andrew Moskowitz, N. Draijer, P. Thomson, P. Barach, P. Kinsler, Peter Maves, Vedat Şar, Christa Krüger, Warwick Middleton
The British Journal of Psychiatry March 17, 2025 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2024.279 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that maladaptive daydreaming should be classified as a formal psychiatric syndrome within the dissociative disorders category, citing its reliable discrimination from other disorders, solid interrater agreement, and dissociative features such as disconnection from perception, behaviour, and sense of self. The authors contend that existing disorders do not account for its phenomenology and that formal recognition would spur awareness, research, and clinical development. |
Abstract
Maladaptive daydreaming is a distinct syndrome in which the main symptom is excessive vivid fantasising that causes clinically significant distress and functional impairment in academic, vocational and social domains. Unlike normal daydreaming, maladaptive daydreaming is persistent, compulsive and detrimental to one’s life. It involves detachment from reality in favour of intense emotional engagement with alternative realities and often includes specific features such as psychomotor stereotypies (e.g. pacing in circles, jumping or shaking one’s hands), mouthing dialogues, facial gestures or enacting fantasy events. Comorbidity is common, but existing disorders do not account for the phenomenology of the symptoms. Whereas non-specific therapy is ineffective, targeted treatment seems promising. Thus, we propose that maladaptive daydreaming be considered a formal syndrome in psychiatric taxonomies, positioned within the dissociative disorders category. Maladaptive daydreaming satisfactorily meets criteria for conceptualisation as a psychiatric syndrome, including reliable discrimination from other disorders and solid interrater agreement. It involves significant dissociative aspects, such as disconnection from perception, behaviour and sense of self, and has some commonalities with but is not subsumed under existing dissociative disorders. Formal recognition of maladaptive daydreaming as a dissociative disorder will encourage awareness of a growing problem and spur theoretical, research and clinical developments.
Citations in the library
Cited by 4
- Dissociative experiences and self-reported interoceptive traits in maladaptive daydreamers: a network analysis European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience June 23, 2026
- Who’s in charge? Linguistic exploration of social media posts reveals reduced sense of agency in dissociation Neuroscience of Consciousness September 2, 2026
- Absorption and Depersonalisation Derealisation Link Childhood Trauma to BPD Severity and Show Strong Independent Predictive Effects for Various BPD Symptom Domains. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation July 9, 2026
- Specifics of The Relationship Between the Intensity of Obsessive Dreams and The Level of Dissociation Innovative science: psychology, pedagogy, defectology June 29, 2026