Panpsychism: Philosophical Debate Without Mathematical or Physical Formalism — E8 Intelligence Research
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) August 12, 2026 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21898010 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Qualitative Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that the panpsychism debate yields no mathematical or physical equations and remains purely philosophical and qualitative, with no equations, constants, ratios, geometric harmonies, base-60 numeration, or crystallographic symmetries referenced. The author rates the debate at depth 1, indicating no mathematical structure or empirical physics is advanced. |
Abstract
FINDING: Panpsychism debate yields no mathematical or physical equations; arguments remain philosophical, not quantitative. | MATH: None. No equations, constants, or ratios derived from any source. | CONNECTION: None. No geometric harmonies, base-60, or crystallographic symmetries referenced. | DEPTH: 1 — Purely qualitative philosophical discourse; no mathematical structure or empirical physics advanced. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com