Panpsychism: Philosophical Debate Lacking Mathematical or Empirical Evidence — E8 Intelligence Research
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) August 9, 2026 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21857378 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Commentary Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that panpsychism is a philosophical debate lacking mathematical or empirical evidence, and that no mathematical content (equations, ratios, or symmetries) is present in the sources. |
Abstract
FINDING: Panpsychism debate remains philosophical; no mathematical or empirical evidence for consciousness as fundamental physics property is presented in these sources. | MATH: None. No equations, constants, or ratios derived or referenced. | CONNECTION: No geometric or harmonic ratios (0.382, 0.618, 0.786, 1.618, 2.618), base-60, or crystallographic symmetries appear. | DEPTH: 1 — These are philosophical arguments, not mathematical or physical findings. No mathematical essence to extract. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com