Panpsychism Debate Lacks Mathematical Formalism, Remains Purely Philosophical — E8 Intelligence Research
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) August 12, 2026 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21898332 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Peer reviewed |
|---|
Abstract
FINDING: Panpsychism debate yields no mathematical formalism; arguments remain philosophical, not quantitative. | MATH: None extracted. No equations, constants, or ratios present in any source. | CONNECTION: No geometric or harmonic ratios (0.382, 0.618, 0.786, 1.618, 2.618), base-60, or crystallographic symmetries identified. | DEPTH: 1 — The sources are purely discursive (TED talks, debates, outreach). No mathematical structure, no testable predictions, no quantitative models. The sole arXiv paper (IPPOG) is about science education outreach, not consciousness. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com