Panpsychism: A Philosophical Debate Lacking Mathematical Formalism — E8 Intelligence Research
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) August 20, 2026 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22022489 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that panpsychism has no mathematical formalism and that consciousness as fundamental remains a philosophical, not quantitative, concept. Claims that no equations, constants, or ratios are present in any source, and that no geometric or harmonic ratios are identified. |
Abstract
FINDING: Panpsychism debate yields no mathematical formalism; consciousness as fundamental remains philosophical, not quantitative. | MATH: None extracted — no equations, constants, or ratios present in any source. | CONNECTION: No geometric or harmonic ratios (0.382, 0.618, 0.786, 1.618, 2.618, base-60, crystallographic symmetry) identified. | DEPTH: 1 — The findings are purely philosophical discourse with zero mathematical content or structural insight. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com