Mysticism and Epistemology
D. Z. Phillips, The Society Of Christian Philosophers
Faith and Philosophy 1995 DOI: 10.5840/faithphil199512214 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Mysticism |
| Key points | Argues that confusions between forms of life and judgements within them lead Pike, Mavrodes, and Katz to conclusions that obscure the confessional character of truth in discussions of mystical experience. |
Abstract
St. Teresa worried over the genuineness of her mystical experience.Her worries have sense within a form of life.Pike argues that her claims must be downgraded if no justification of the form of life can be given.The Devil could deceive us about any justification, Mavrodes argues, but certain experiences can be self-authenticating.Treating forms of life as though they were interpretations, Katz concludes that we must be agnostic about their truth.The paper argues that confusions between forms of life and judgements within them lead these authors to conclusions which obscure the confessional character of truth in these contexts.