Skip to content

The Logic of Mysticism—I

Herbert McCabe

Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement March 1, 1992 DOI: 10.1017/s1358246100002101 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Mysticism
Key points Argues that Thomas Aquinas, despite his reputation for dry rationalism, was a mystical thinker centrally concerned with the unknown and ineffable mystery of God, and that even his arguments for God's existence constitute a mystical exploration—not a mystical experience—centered on the notion of "esse."

Abstract

This title represents, I suppose, a kind of challenge; for there seems at first sight some incompatibility between the practice of logic and mysticism, a contrast between the rational and the intuitive, the tough minded and the tender-minded. In taking up this challenge, I propose to argue with the help of two thinkers commonly admired for their attention to logic and its rights. I shall refer for the most part to St Thomas Aquinas but with occasional reference to Wittgenstein. Whatever may be said of the latter, it seems to me quite clear that St Thomas was a mystical thinker in that he was centrally concerned with the unknown and, in one sense, ineffable mystery of God and that he devoted a great deal of thought and writing to the problems associated with speaking of what is, in this sense, ineffable. I want to argue that in what is sometimes misunderstood as his dryly rational approach, even in his arguments for the existence of God, he is in fact engaged in, and inviting the reader to be engaged in, a mystical exploration, which is not at all the same thing as a mystical experience. Here the key notion is that of what he refers to as esse.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on mysticism, most cited first.

Explore topics