Skip to content

The Stream of Consciousness: IV. Adolf Grünbaum's Atomicity

Thomas Natsoulas

Imagination Cognition and Personality March 1, 1994 DOI: 10.2190/dn21-qpwq-11rv-me3q (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Citations 11
Key points The author examines Grünbaum's case for the atomicity of James's stream of consciousness through the objection that continuous unchanging-pitch auditory experience lacks discrete pulsational structure. The author replies to Miller's two criticisms of Grünbaum's dependence claim but also casts doubt on Grünbaum's general account.

Abstract

I devote most of the present article, which is the fourth in a series concerning the nature and characteristics of William James's stream of consciousness, to an examination of Adolf Grünbaum's case for the stream's atomicity. For this purpose, I use the lens provided by the objection that auditory perceptual experience of a continuous sound of unchanging pitch does not exhibit a discrete, pulsational temporal structure. Also, I discuss Izchak Miller's two criticisms of Grünbaum's claim that temporal awareness of present physical or mental events depends on a certain kind of conceptualized awareness of the stream. Miller argues that such conceptualized awareness, being a matter of judgment, requires rather than explains temporal awareness; and also that perceptual experience necessarily involves individuating the object perceived, which in turn already involves temporal awareness. I give cogent replies to these two criticisms, but I cast some doubt as well on Grünbaum's general account.