Skip to content

The Mystical Experience: with an Emphasis on Wittgenstein and Zen

Charles Cox, Jean W. Cox

Religious Studies December 1, 1976 DOI: 10.1017/s0034412500009628 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Buddhism Mystical experience
Key points Argues that mysticism has been neglected and misunderstood in the Western tradition, where it is often dismissed as esoteric, otherworldly, irrational, and irrelevant. Proposes that mysticism is instead a singular human experience that lies at the foundations of civilization.

Abstract

Mysticism and the mystical experience seemingly play little or no part in our Western tradition. Certainly there is no mystical tradition in the West such as Zen Buddhism, nor is there any great understanding of or influence from the writings of Heraclitus, Spinoza, or the mystical passages in the early work of Wittgenstein. Mysticism has been generally misunderstood in the West, and it has even evoked the attacks of philosophers and theologians.1 Mysticism to many conjures up images of monks meditating in caves; it is generally pictured as esoteric, otherworldly, irrational, and at best irrelevant to the daily lives of human beings. If what we say below is correct, it will be seen that mysticism is none of these but is rather a singular human experience that lies at the foundations of civilization.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on buddhism, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics