Beyond Integration: Neural Dimensionality and the Landau–Ginzburg Physics of Awareness
Alessandro Rossi, Antonio Smecca
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper |
|---|---|
| Key points | Proposes that the dimensionality of neural correlation structure, operationalized as the Participation Ratio, constitutes a second order parameter D governing a phase transition distinct from global integration Φ, defining a 'Redundant Integrated State' Δ (high Φ, low D) where integrated mental function exists without phenomenal experience. Generates three falsifiable predictions: power-law scaling D* ∼ |Φ − Φ_c|^ν, diverging susceptibility χ_D, and dissociation between MCS and VS patients in (Φ, D) space. |
Abstract
Abstract Two-dimensional accounts of consciousness that distinguish global integration from functional diversity are empirically supported [1,2] but lack a formal phase-structure: they do not specify the nature of the transition between the two regimes, the order parameter that governs it, or the quantitative predictions that follow. We provide this structure. We propose that the dimensionality of the neural correlation structure, operationalised as the Participation Ratio of the covariance eigenspectrum, constitutes a second, independent order parameter D that governs a phase transition distinct from global integration Φ. Formalised through a Landau–Ginzburg free energy functional F[Φ, D], this transition defines a Redundant Integrated State Δ (high Φ, low D) in which globally integrated mental function is present but phenomenal experience is absent, a thermodynamic phase, not a point on a continuum. The framework generates three falsifiable predictions absent from prior work: (i) a power-law scaling D* ∼ |Φ − Φ_c|^ ν with measurable critical exponent ν ; (ii) a diverging susceptibility χ_D = ∂D/∂Φ at the consciousness threshold, quantifiable from perturbational EEG; (iii) an explicit dissociation between MCS and VS patients in the (Φ, D) space, with MCS predicted to occupy state Δ. These predictions are directly testable with existing methodology and are not generated by any current theory of consciousness.
Citations in the library
Cites 6
- On a confusion about a function of consciousness Behavioral and Brain Sciences June 1, 1995
- Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State Science September 7, 2006
- A Theoretically Based Index of Consciousness Independent of Sensory Processing and Behavior Science Translational Medicine August 14, 2013
- Consciousness-specific dynamic interactions of brain integration and functional diversity Nature Communications October 10, 2019
- Integrated information theory: from consciousness to its physical substrate. Nature Reviews Neuroscience July 2016
and 1 more in the library