Skip to content

New multiplicities of dreaming and REMing

Harry T. Hunt

Behavioral and Brain Sciences December 1, 2000 DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x00514022 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Dreaming
Citations 11
Key points Argues that the REM state as a prolongation of the orientation response to novelty fits pluralistic models of dreaming consciousness (e.g., Hobson, Nielsen, Solms) better than monistic single-factor models (e.g., Vertes & Eastman, Revonsuo).

Abstract

The five authors vary in the degree to which the recent neuroscience of the REM state leads them towards multiple dimensions and forms of dreaming consciousness (Hobson et al.; Nielsen; Solms) or toward all-explanatory single factor models (Vertes & Eastman, Revonsuo). The view of the REM state as a prolongation of the orientation response to novelty fits best with the former pluralisms but not the latter monisms. [Hobson et al.; Nielsen; Revonsuo; Solms; Vertes & Eastman]

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on dreaming, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics