Skip to content

First, scale up to the robotic Turing test, then worry about feeling.

Stevan Harnad, Peter Scherzer

Artificial intelligence in medicine October 2008 DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2008.08.008 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that consciousness, being feeling, cannot have causal power, so it cannot be explained by cognitive science; the field's only viable target is the robotic Turing test, explaining performance without addressing consciousness.

Abstract

Consciousness is feeling, and the problem of consciousness is the problem of explaining how and why some of the functions underlying some of our performance capacities are felt rather than just "functed." But unless we are prepared to assign to feeling a telekinetic power (which all evidence contradicts), feeling cannot be assigned any causal power at all. We cannot explain how or why we feel. Hence the empirical target of cognitive science can only be to scale up to the robotic Turing test, which is to explain all of our performance capacity, but without explaining consciousness or incorporating it in any way in our functional explanation.