Skip to content

Dantrolene in the treatment of MDMA-related hyperpyrexia: a systematic review.

Brian E Grunau, Matthew O Wiens, Jeffrey R Brubacher

CJEM September 2010 DOI: 10.1017/s1481803500012598 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Randomized Peer reviewed
Sample size 71
Population Human cases of MDMA-induced hyperpyrexia reported in case reports
Intervention Dantrolene
Topics MDMA
Key findings Dantrolene was associated with higher survival (21/26) compared to no dantrolene (25/45), especially in extreme (≥42°C) and severe (≥40°C) fever, with survival rates of 8/13 and 10/10 versus 0/4 and 15/27, respectively. No adverse events were attributed to dantrolene except possible transient hypoglycemia.

Abstract

The use of dantrolene in the treatment of hyperpyrexia related to MDMA (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine) is controversial, with little data available to guide clinical decision-making. Although the treatment is recommended by several poison control centres, published data are primarily in the form of case reports and animal and in vitro experiments. We conducted a systematic review to investigate the published evidence regarding the safety and benefits of dantrolene for MDMA-related hyperpyrexia in humans. A systematic search of Embase and MEDLINE was conducted from the earliest possible date to November 2008. All human trials and case reports of MDMA related hyperpyrexia were considered. Data were abstracted systematically and characteristics including use of dantrolene, adverse reactions attributed to dantrolene, peak temperature, complications from MDMA-related hyperpyrexia and survival were recorded. Our search yielded 668 articles of which 53, reporting 71 cases of MDMA-induced hyperpyrexia, met our inclusion criteria. No clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, observational studies or meta-analyses were identified. Dantrolene was used in 26 cases. Patient characteristics were similar in the dantrolene and no dantrolene groups. The proportion of survivors was higher in the dantrolene group (21/26) than in the no dantrolene group (25/45). This difference was especially pronounced in those with extreme (≥ 42°C) and severe (≥ 40°C) fever, with a survival rate of 8 of 13 and 10 of 10, respectively, in the dantrolene group compared with 0 of 4 and 15 of 27 in the no dantrolene group. There were no reports of adverse events attributable to dantrolene with the exception of a possible association with an episode of transient hypoglycemia. Our systematic review suggests that dantrolene is safe for patients with MDMA-related hyperpyrexia. Dantrolene may also be associated with improved survival and reduced complications, especially in patients with extreme (≥ 42°C) or severe (≥ 40°C) hyperpyrexia, although this conclusion must be interpreted with caution given the risk of reporting or publication bias.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on MDMA, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics