Skip to content

The safety of studies with intravenous Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol in humans, with case histories.

Michelle Carbuto, R Andrew Sewell, Ashley H Williams, Kim Forselius-Bielen, Gabriel Braley, Jacqueline Elander, Brian Pittman, Ashley Schnakenberg, Savita Bhakta, Edward Perry, Mohini Ranganathan, Deepak Cyril D'Souza

Psychopharmacology February 2012 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-011-2417-y (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Retrospective review Peer reviewed
Sample size 266
Population Subjects from 11 intravenous THC studies, including 14 schizophrenia patients and 252 healthy subjects (76 frequent cannabis users)
Interventions Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) Placebo
Dose >2.1 mg/70 kg (higher doses associated with more adverse events)
Duration Up to 12 months follow-up
Topics Cannabis
Key findings Intravenous THC infusions were associated with relatively low risk: one serious and 70 minor adverse events in 9.7% of subjects and 7.4% of infusions. Faster infusion rates and higher doses increased adverse event likelihood. Long-term follow-up indicated most subjects reported no change or reduced desire to use cannabis.

Abstract

Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is one of the few cannabinoid receptor ligands that can be used to probe the cannabinoid system in humans. Despite increasing interest in the cannabinoid receptor system, use of intravenous THC as a research tool has been limited by concerns about its abuse liability and psychoactive effects. This study aims to evaluate the safety of all intravenous THC studies conducted at this center for the past 13 years. Included were 11 studies with 266 subjects (14 schizophrenia patients and 252 healthy subjects, of whom 76 were frequent cannabis users), 351 active THC infusions, and 226 placebo infusions. Subjects were monitored for subjective and physical adverse events and followed up to 12 months beyond study participation. There was one serious and 70 minor adverse events in 9.7% of subjects and 7.4% of infusions, with 8.5% occurring after the end of the test day. Nausea and dizziness were the most frequent side effects. Adverse events were more likely to be associated with faster infusion rates (2-5 min) and higher doses (>2.1 mg/70 kg). Of 149 subjects on whom long-term follow-up data were gathered, 94% reported either no change or a reduction in their desire to use cannabis in the post-study period, 18% stated that their cannabis use decreased, and 3% stated that it increased in the post-study period. With careful subject selection and screening, risk to subjects is relatively low. Safeguards are generally sufficient and effective, reducing both the duration and severity of adverse events.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on cannabis, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
High-potency cannabis and the risk of psychosis People with first episode of psychosis and healthy controls from the local population 2009 Case-control study n = 454
Ayahuasca-Assisted Therapy for Addiction: Results from a Preliminary Observational Study in Canada Rural aboriginal population 2013 Observational study
Impaired cognitive performance in drug free users of recreational ecstasy (MDMA) Otherwise healthy young people 2000 Observational
Continued cannabis use and risk of incidence and persistence of psychotic symptoms: 10 year follow-up cohort study Individuals from the general population in Germany aged 14-24 at baseline 2011 Observational cohort n = 1,923
Cannabis-induced psychosis and subsequent schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: follow-up study of 535 incident cases Patients treated for cannabis-induced psychotic symptoms in Denmark between 1994 and... 2005 Observational cohort n = 535

Citations in the library

Cited by 10

and 5 more in the library

Cites 12

and 7 more in the library

Explore topics