Skip to content

Visual mental imagery in typical imagers and in aphantasia: A millimeter-scale 7-T fMRI study.

Jianghao Liu, Minye Zhan, Dounia Hajhajate, Alfredo Spagna, Stanislas Dehaene, Laurent Cohen, Paolo Bartolomeo

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior April 2025 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2025.01.013 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational cohort Peer reviewed
Sample size 20
Population Ten typical imagers and ten individuals with congenital aphantasia
Keywords Aphantasia Consciousness Fusiform imagery node Visual mental imagery FMRI
Key findings In typical imagers, imagery activated left-hemisphere frontoparietal areas, domain-preferring ventral temporal areas, and a domain-general left fusiform area (the Fusiform Imagery Node). Aphantasic individuals showed similar visual activation but reduced functional connectivity between the Fusiform Imagery Node and frontoparietal areas.

Abstract

Most of us effortlessly describe visual objects, whether seen or remembered. Yet, around 4% of people report congenital aphantasia: they struggle to visualize objects despite being able to describe their visual appearance. What neural mechanisms create this disparity between subjective experience and objective performance? Aphantasia can provide novel insights into conscious processing and awareness. We used ultra-high field 7T fMRI to establish the neural circuits involved in visual mental imagery and perception, and to elucidate the neural mechanisms associated with the processing of internally generated visual information in the absence of imagery experience in congenital aphantasia. Ten typical imagers and 10 aphantasic individuals performed imagery and perceptual tasks in five domains: object shape, object color, written words, faces, and spatial relationships. In typical imagers, imagery tasks activated left-hemisphere frontoparietal areas, the relevant domain-preferring areas in the ventral temporal cortex partly overlapping with the perceptual domain-preferring areas, and a domain-general area in the left fusiform gyrus (the Fusiform Imagery Node). The results were valid for each individual participant. In aphantasic individuals, imagery activated similar visual areas, but there was reduced functional connectivity between the Fusiform Imagery Node and frontoparietal areas. Our results unveil the domain-general and domain-specific circuits of visual mental imagery, their functional disorganization in aphantasia, and support the general hypothesis that conscious visual experience - whether perceived or imagined - depends on the integrated activity of high-level visual cortex and frontoparietal networks.