Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Mindfulness meditation for workplace wellness: An evidence map

L. Hilton, Nell J. Marshall, A. Motala, Stephanie L. Taylor, Isomi M. Miake-Lye, S. Baxi, R. Shanman, Michele R. Solloway, Jessica M Beroesand, S. Hempel

Work May 28, 2019 DOI: 10.3233/wor-192922 (opens in new tab) via Semantic Scholar

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

An evidence map of 175 systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials on mindfulness interventions shows that most research addresses general health, psychological conditions, chronic illness, pain, and substance use. Only 26 reviews focused on workplace settings or specific occupational groups such as healthcare professionals, educators, and caregivers. The map illustrates the distribution of evidence by primary outcome area and outlines promising applications. The authors conclude that the evidence map offers an overview to inform policy and organizational decisions about employee wellbeing, while highlighting gaps in workplace-specific research.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Evidence map of systematic reviews Randomized Peer reviewed
Sample size 175
Population Systematic reviews of mindfulness interventions, including workplace settings and occupational groups
Keywords Psychology Medicine
Key finding The evidence map shows that most mindfulness research addresses general health, psychological conditions, chronic illness, pain, and substance use, with fewer reviews in workplace contexts.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mindfulness interventions aim to foster greater attention and awareness of present moment experiences. Uptake of mindfulness programs in the workplace has grown as organizations look to support employee health, wellbeing, and performance. OBJECTIVE: In support of evidence-based decision making in workplace contexts, we created an evidence map summarizing physical and mental health, cognitive, affective, and interpersonal outcomes from systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of mindfulness interventions. METHODS: We searched nine electronic databases to July 2017, dually-screened all reviews, and consulted topic experts to identify systematic reviews on mindfulness interventions. The distribution of evidence is presented as an evidence map in a bubble plot. RESULTS: In total, 175 systematic reviews met inclusion criteria. Reviews included a variety of mindfulness-based interventions. The largest review included 109 randomized controlled trials. The majority of these addressed general health, psychological conditions, chronic illness, pain, and substance use. Twenty-six systematic reviews assessed studies conducted in workplace settings and with healthcare professionals, educators, and caregivers. The evidence map shows the prevalence of research by the primary area of focus. An outline of promising applications of mindfulness interventions is included. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence map provides an overview of existing mindfulness research. It shows the body of available evidence to inform policy and organizational decision-making supporting employee wellbeing in work contexts.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment