Skip to content

Mindfulness, depression, and emotional eating: The moderating role of nonjudging of inner experience.

Ti Hsu, Catherine A Forestell

Appetite December 26, 2020 DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.105089 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional study Peer reviewed
Sample size 248
Population Diverse community sample of adults
Measures Five Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire
Topics Anxiety Depression Meditation
Keywords Humans Cross-sectional studies Emotions Emotional eating
Key findings Depression significantly interacted with the mindfulness facet nonjudging of inner experience to predict emotional eating. Participants high in nonjudging endorsed less emotional eating than those average or low in nonjudging, and this difference was significant only at low levels of depression. The authors argue this delineates a moderating role for specific aspects of trait mindfulness.

Abstract

Emotional eating is defined as the tendency to increase food consumption in order to modify negative emotional states. Theories on emotional eating attribute its cause to inadequate emotion regulation, specifically an inability to draw awareness to and accept distress. Mindfulness, or the ability to pay attention to and accept internal and external experiences, is thought to attenuate the association between internalizing distress and emotional eating. Nevertheless, there has been little research examining the moderating role of mindfulness in the relationship between psychological distress and emotional eating. The present study used a cross-sectional design to probe the effects of specific facets of mindfulness, as measured by the Five Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire, on the relationship between internalizing distress (i.e., depression and anxiety) and emotional eating in a diverse community sample (N = 248). Results showed that depression significantly interacted with nonjudging of inner experience to predict emotional eating. Those who were high in nonjudging endorsed less emotional eating than those who were average or low in nonjudging. This was significant only at low levels of depression. These findings delineate the moderating role of specific aspects of trait mindfulness in the association between depression and emotional eating and may inform more targeted intervention and prevention efforts.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Psychological flexibility mediates the relations between acute psychedelic effects and subjective decreases in depression and anxiety. International sample of people who reported having used a psychedelic 2020 Cross-sectional survey n = 985
5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeO-DMT) used in a naturalistic group setting is associated with unintended improvements in depression and anxiety. Adults who used 5-MeO-DMT in a group setting with structured procedures 2019 Cross-sectional survey n = 362
Psychological and neuropsychological assessment of regular hoasca users. Regular hoasca users from a U.S. branch of União do Vegetal and matched non-user controls 2016 Cross-sectional study n = 57
Adults who microdose psychedelics report health related motivations and lower levels of anxiety and depression compared to non-microdosers Self-selected microdosers and non-microdosers recruited via a mobile application 2021 Cross-sectional survey n = 8,703
Effects of Naturalistic Psychedelic Use on Depression, Anxiety, and Well-Being: Associations With Patterns of Use, Reported Harms, and Transformative Mental States. Adults with at least one lifetime psychedelic experience 2022 Cross-sectional survey n = 2,510

Citations in the library

Explore topics