Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Extended Minds and Instrumentality

Julian Asbaeck

On_Culture March 5, 2026 DOI: 10.22029/oc.2016.1362 (opens in new tab) via DOAJ

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

This contribution takes a literary approach to extended cognition, using fictional journal entries to explore how interactions with nonhuman instruments shape cognitive development. The narrative tracks the emergence of novel cognitive structures following the introduction of a communication device, offering a genealogy of a communal shift in thought. A subsequent scholarly reflection rejects the idea that cognition is confined to the head, elaborating hybrid alliances between humans and nonhumans. It applies the extended mind hypothesis to artificial intelligence, asking how computational architectures that adapt to behavioral patterns modify critical assessment of the instrument relation.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Extended cognition Instrumentality Nonhuman Cognitive development Bodily-sensory perception
Key finding Argues that cognition is not limited to the head and that adaptive computational architectures alter how the instrument relation should be critically assessed.

Abstract

This contribution offers a literary approach to extended cognition and asks in which capacity interactions with the nonhuman come to shape cognitive development. Specifically, this question is posed in regards to our active use of nonhuman instruments that are recognized as a reflection of social practices that mediate our engagement with the world. In this sense, the fictional journal entries of this _perspective track the development of novel cognitive structures on the basis of a recently introduced communication device. The narration provides a genealogy of a communal shift in thought and in conclusion advances speculations on the mediating role of instruments. In continuation, the narrative segment is followed by a scholarly reflection which decidedly rejects the idea of cognition as limited to the confines of the head. Through elaborating the hybrid alliances between ourselves and the nonhuman, this second segment mobilizes concerns of the extended mind hypothesis in the context of artificial intelligence. This succinct reflection hence applies questions regarding the mediating role of instruments to the domain of artificial intelligence and asks how computational architectures which actively adapt to our behavioral patterns modify the way in which the instrument relation ought to be critically assessed.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment