Two Tongues for One Mind—Buddhism and Psychoanalysis
February 10, 2026 DOI: 10.4324/9781003715306-17 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper |
|---|---|
| Topics | Buddhism |
| Keywords | Criticism Psychoanalytic theory Meaning existential Feature linguistics Argument complex analysis Psychoanalysis Jungian analytical psychology |
| Key points | Argues that Buddhism and psychoanalysis converge not through shared concepts but through recursive style, and that the analyst's task is to bear witness to both grammars without collapsing one into the other. |
Abstract
This chapter explores the layered dialogue between Buddhism and psychoanalysis as two symbolic languages spoken by one mind. Rather than seeking integration or synthesis, it traces how each discourse illuminates different dimensions of psychic truth: psychoanalysis naming the structured, split, and desiring subject; Buddhism articulating emptiness, interdependence, and nondual awareness. Drawing on Freud, Winnicott, Loewald, and Madhyamaka philosophy, this chapter suggests that the clinical and contemplative paths converge not through shared concepts, but through recursive style—a way of listening to the unspoken ground behind what is said. The analytic situation becomes a site where the two tongues echo each other in silence, affective pacing, and delayed symbolization. Truth arises not through reconciliation, but through holding paradox: the self as both illusion and necessity, form and emptiness. The analyst’s task is to bear witness to both grammars without collapsing one into the other—to speak as one who has heard both.