Vegas, Disney, and the Metaverse

David J. Chalmers' book "Reality+: Virtual Worlds and the Problems of Philosophy" examines historical philosophical skepticism about distinguishing reality from illusion, tracing it from ancient Chinese, Indian, and Greek thinkers through Descartes. Chalmers interprets Zhuangzi's butterfly dream, Narada's dream of living as a woman, and Plato's cave allegory as raising philosophical questions about knowledge, reality, and value. He contends that these classical concerns about the perceptibility of material reality persisted into the modern era, culminating in Descartes' Meditations, which Chalmers argues set the agenda for subsequent Western philosophy regarding virtual worlds and reality.

Study at a glance

Abstract

In his technophilosophical investigation Reality+: Virtual Worlds and the Problems of Philosophy, David J. Chalmers discusses the historical skepticism about the human capacity to recognize material reality.Already in the centuries before our era, Chinese, Indian, and Greek thinkers independently raised whether humans could distinguish between what was real and what was an illusion.Chalmers outlines Zuanghzi's dream about being a butterfly, Narada's dream in which he lived an entire life as a woman, and Plato's allegory of the cave whose imprisoned inhabitants mistake distorted and selective reflections for reality.He interprets these doubts as examples of philosophical domains: "Knowledge: How can Zhuangzi know whether or not he's dreaming?Reality: Is Narada's transformation real or illusory?Value: Can one lead a good life in Plato's cave?" 1 Classical philosophy's concerns about the perceptibility of material reality continued into the modern era, culminating in Ren Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy. 2 With them, Chalmers writes, Descartes "set the agenda for centuries of Western 1 Chalmers,