Skip to content

Towards a Comparative Study of Animal Consciousness

W. Veit

Biological Theory August 30, 2022 DOI: 10.1007/s13752-022-00409-x (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Philosophy of mind
Key points Argues that comparing the life histories of gastropods and arthropods, using the pathological complexity thesis and state-based behavioral life history theory, can illuminate the origins and function of consciousness.

Abstract

In order to develop a true biological science of consciousness, we have to remove humans from the center of reference and develop a bottom-up comparative study of animal minds, as Donald Griffin intended with his call for a “cognitive ethology.” In this article, I make use of the pathological complexity thesis (Veit 2022a, b, c) to show that we can firmly ground a comparative study of animal consciousness by drawing on the resources of state-based behavioral life history theory. By comparing the different life histories of gastropods and arthropods, we will be able to make better sense of the possible origins of consciousness and its function for organisms in their natural environments.