Between No-Self and the Algorithm: Buddhist Mind-Nature as Ethical Architecture for AI and Human Self-Realization
Religions March 17, 2026 DOI: 10.3390/rel17030378 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractBuddhist theories of mind-nature can inform ethical AI design by treating AI not as an autonomous moral subject but as a contingent mirror of human data, design, and intention. The article argues that although present AI does not possess prajñā, it can serve as a mindfulness aid by making patterns of thought, emotion, and desire more visible. Drawing on the Five Precepts and Ten Wholesome Deeds, it proposes design and oversight principles oriented toward non-harm, truthful communication, fairness, and the reduction of greed, hatred, and delusion. The authors contend that AI ethics is inseparable from human moral agency, and that cultivating a “digital Pure Land” depends on the moral choices of decision-makers, engineers, policy-makers, and users.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Buddhism Meditation |
| Keywords | Doctrine Architecture Delusion |
| Key finding | Argues that Buddhist ethics, particularly the doctrines of no-self and the Five Precepts, can guide AI design toward supporting human awakening and reducing delusion, rather than treating AI as a moral subject. |
Abstract
This article explores how Buddhist theories of mind-nature can inform ethical design in artificial intelligence (AI), focusing on AI as a supportive condition for human awakening and self-realization. Drawing on the doctrine of no-self, it argues that AI should not be treated as an autonomous moral subject, but as a contingent mirror of human data, design, and intention. Although present AI does not possess prajñā, it can serve as a mindfulness aid by making patterns of thought, emotion, and desire more visible. Building on the Five Precepts and Ten Wholesome Deeds, the paper proposes design and oversight principles oriented toward non-harm, truthful communication, fairness, and the reduction of greed, hatred, and delusion in digital environments. It concludes that AI ethics is inseparable from the human moral agency, and that cultivating a “digital Pure Land” depends on the moral choices of decision-makers, engineers, policy-makers, and users, thereby linking technical governance to spiritual practice.