Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Consciousness and Reality: A Comparative Study of the Philosophical Foundationsof Marx and Hegel

Chengwen Song, Mengzhou Wu

Global Review of Humanities, Arts, and Society April 3, 2025 DOI: 10.63802/grhas.v1.i1.2 (opens in new tab) via Semantic Scholar

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

This paper compares the philosophical foundations of Hegel and Marx, focusing on their conceptions of consciousness and reality. Hegel's dialectical idealism views reality as the unfolding of Absolute Spirit, while Marx's materialist dialectics locates consciousness in socio-historical praxis. The analysis examines Marx's critique of Feuerbach's abstract humanism and Stirner's radical egoism, developing the concept of the 'real individual' as historically situated and socially embedded. The paper demonstrates how Marx inherits and subverts Hegel's system, transforming it into a critical theory of liberation, showing this dialogue between idealism and materialism remains vital for understanding contemporary power, ideology, and agency.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Philosophy
Key finding Argues that Marx inherits and subverts Hegel's dialectical idealism, transforming it into a materialist critical theory of liberation centered on the historically situated and socially embedded "real individual."

Abstract

This study offers a comparative analysis of the philosophical foundations of G. W. F. Hegel and Karl Marx with a focus on their respective conceptions of consciousness and reality. Drawing from classical texts and contemporary scholarship, it reconstructs Hegel’s dialectical idealism, which views reality as the unfolding of Absolute Spirit, and contrasts it with Marx’s materialist dialectics, which locates consciousness in socio-historical praxis. The analysis highlights Marx’s critique of Feuerbach’s abstract humanism and Stirner’s radical egoism, culminating in the notion of the “real individual” as historically situated and socially embedded. Through a layered examination of method, history, subjectivity, and community, the paper demonstrates how Marx inherits and subverts Hegel’s philosophical system, transforming it into a critical theory of liberation. This dialogue between idealism and materialism, abstract freedom and practical emancipation, remains vital for understanding contemporary structures of power, ideology, and agency.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment