Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Panpsychism, Emergence, and Pluralities: Reply to Bohn

Donnchadh O’Conaill

Australasian Journal of Philosophy May 18, 2021 DOI: 10.1080/00048402.2021.1925936 (opens in new tab) via Semantic Scholar

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Pluralized panpsychism, which holds that consciousness is fundamentally a property of groups of basic objects, is structurally similar to emergentism and struggles to explain how a plurality of basic objects could be a subject of experiences. Because of these issues, this view does not offer a substantial improvement over orthodox panpsychism.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Philosophy
Key finding Argues that pluralized panpsychism is structurally similar to emergentism and faces the problem of explaining how a plurality of basic objects could be a subject of experiences, and thus is not a substantial improvement on orthodox panpsychism.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Einar Bohn [AJP 2019] has proposed a version of panpsychism on which consciousness is fundamentally a property of pluralities of basic objects. I argue that this pluralized panpsychism is structurally similar to emergentism, and faces the problem of explaining how a plurality of basic objects could be a subject of experiences. Because of these issues, pluralized panpsychism is not a substantial improvement on orthodox panpsychism.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment