Skip to content

Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling

J. David Creswell, Baldwin M. Way, Naomi I. Eisenberger, Matthew D. Lieberman

Psychosomatic Medicine July 1, 2007 DOI: 10.1097/psy.0b013e3180f6171f (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational cross-sectional Peer reviewed
Sample size 27
Population Adult participants
Topics Meditation
Keywords Affect linguistics Neurocognitive Amygdala Ventromedial prefrontal cortex Psychological intervention Attentional control Clinical psychology Cognition
Citations 840
Key findings Dispositional mindfulness was associated with greater prefrontal cortical activation and reduced bilateral amygdala activity during affect labeling, with strong negative prefrontal-amygdala coupling in high-mindfulness participants.

Abstract

Objective: Mindfulness is a process whereby one is aware and receptive to present moment experiences. Although mindfulness-enhancing interventions reduce pathological mental and physical health symptoms across a wide variety of conditions and diseases, the mechanisms underlying these effects remain unknown. Converging evidence from the mindfulness and neuroscience literature suggests that labeling affect may be one mechanism for these effects.

Methods: Participants (n = 27) indicated trait levels of mindfulness and then completed an affect labeling task while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging. The labeling task consisted of matching facial expressions to appropriate affect words (affect labeling) or to gender-appropriate names (gender labeling control task).

Results: After controlling for multiple individual difference measures, dispositional mindfulness was associated with greater widespread prefrontal cortical activation, and reduced bilateral amygdala activity during affect labeling, compared with the gender labeling control task. Further, strong negative associations were found between areas of prefrontal cortex and right amygdala responses in participants high in mindfulness but not in participants low in mindfulness.

Conclusions: The present findings with a dispositional measure of mindfulness suggest one potential neurocognitive mechanism for understanding how mindfulness meditation interventions reduce negative affect and improve health outcomes, showing that mindfulness is associated with enhanced prefrontal cortical regulation of affect through labeling of negative affective stimuli.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups 2008 Cross-sectional study
Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents 2011 Cross-sectional validation study n = 1,413
Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 152
Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates 2008 Cross-sectional, correlational
Impact of meditation training on the default mode network during a restful state 13 experienced meditators (over 1000 h of training) and 11 beginner meditators (no... 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 24

Citations in the library

Explore topics